ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .
Deal or No Deal: Why Courts Should Allow Defendants to Present Evidence that They Rejected Favorable Plea Bargains
dc.contributor.author | Miller, Colin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-02-16T22:15:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-16T22:15:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-03-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Miller, Colin. "Deal or No Deal: Why Courts Should Allow Defendants to Present Evidence that They Rejected Favorable Plea Bargains". Kansas Law Review, Kansas Law Review Inc. March, 2011: vol. 59(3). | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/20150 | |
dc.description | This is the published version. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Kansas Law Review Inc | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | http://law.ku.edu/kansas-law-review-issues# | |
dc.title | Deal or No Deal: Why Courts Should Allow Defendants to Present Evidence that They Rejected Favorable Plea Bargains | en_US |
dc.type | Article | |
kusw.kudepartment | Law | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17161/1808.20150 | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
University of Kansas Law Review, Volume 59 (2010-2011) [33]
Each article's citation contains the volume and issue number.