Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLi, Yue
dc.contributor.authorChan, Mark Sai Leong
dc.contributor.authorFirman, Umar
dc.contributor.authorFinger, Kris
dc.contributor.authorMills, Megan M.
dc.contributor.authorBai, Yong
dc.contributor.authorSchrock, Steven D.
dc.contributor.authorChong, Oswald
dc.contributor.authorAtchley, Paul
dc.contributor.authorPerlmutter, David D.
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-09T20:07:05Z
dc.date.available2016-02-09T20:07:05Z
dc.date.issued2009-01
dc.identifier.citationLi, Y., Chan, M., Firman, U., Finger, K., Mills, M., Bai, Y. Schrock, S., Chong, O., Atchley, P., and Perlmutter, D., "Improving Highway Work Zone Safety," Final Report, KU Transportation Research Institute, Kansas Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, January 2009, 196 pgs.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/19938
dc.description.abstractHighway work zones disrupt normal traffic flow and can create severe safety problems. Due to the rising needs in highway maintenance and construction in the United States, the number of work zones is increasing nationwide. With a total of 1,010 fatalities and more than 40,000 injuries occurring in 2006, improvements in work zone safety are necessary. The three primary objectives of this research project included: 1) to determine the effectiveness of a Portable Changeable Message Sign (PCMS) in reducing vehicle speeds on two-lane, rural highway work zones; 2) to determine the effectiveness of a Temporary Traffic Sign (TTS), (W20-1, “Road Work Ahead”); and 3) to determine motorists’ responses to the signage. To accomplish these objectives, field experiments were conducted at US-36 and US-73 in Seneca and Hiawatha, Kansas, respectively. During the field experiments, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the PCMS was conducted under three different conditions: 1) PCMS on; 2) PCMS off, but still visible; and 3) PCMS removed from the road and out of sight. The researchers also divided the vehicles into three classes (passenger car, truck, and semitrailer) and compared the mean speed change of these classes based on three different sign setups: PCMS on, PCMS off, and the use of the TTS (W20-1, “Road Work Ahead”). A survey was also conducted at the experimental work zones to obtain a general understanding of the motorists’ attitudes as they traveled through the construction areas. Based on the data analysis results, researchers concluded that the presence of the PCMS effectively reduced vehicle speeds on two-lane highway work zones. A slow speed is more likely to reduce the probability of a crash or the severity of a crash. In addition, researchers performed a univariate analysis of the variance test to determine if a significant interaction existed between motorists’ responses and the sign conditions. The results showed a significant interaction between the signs and passenger car vehicles.en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas Center for Research, Inc.en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://iri.ku.edu/reportsen_US
dc.titleImproving Highway Work Zone Safetyen_US
dc.typeTechnical Report
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2814-0422
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record