dc.contributor.author | Hyder, Zafar | |
dc.contributor.author | Butler, James J., Jr. | |
dc.contributor.author | McElwee, Carl D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Wenzhi | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-16T19:15:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-12-16T19:15:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1994-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hyder, Zafar, James J. Butler, Carl D. Mcelwee, and Wenzhi Liu. "Slug Tests in Partially Penetrating Wells." Water Resources Research Water Resour. Res. 30.11 (1994): 2945-957. DOI:10.1029/94WR01670 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/19217 | |
dc.description | This is the published version. Copyright American Geophysical Union | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | A semianalytical solution is presented to a mathematical model describing the flow of groundwater in response to a slug test in a confined or unconfined porous formation. The model incorporates the effects of partial penetration, anisotropy, finiteradius well skins, and upper and lower boundaries of either a constant-head or an impermeable form. This model is employed to investigate the error that is introduced into hydraulic conductivity estimates through use of currently accepted practices (i.e., Hvorslev, 1951; Cooper et al., 1967) for the analysis of slug-test response data. The magnitude of the error arising in a variety of commonly faced field configurations is the basis for practical guidelines for the analysis of slug-test data that can be utilized by field practitioners. | en_US |
dc.publisher | American Geophysical Union | en_US |
dc.title | Slug tests in partially penetrating wells | en_US |
dc.type | Article | |
kusw.kuauthor | Butler, James. J. Jr. | |
kusw.kudepartment | Kansas Geological Survey | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1029/94WR01670 | |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, publisher version | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |