ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

Method or madness: does OTU delineation bias our perceptions of fungal ecology?

dc.contributor.authorPowell, Jeff R.
dc.contributor.authorSikes, Benjamin A.
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-18T04:28:12Z
dc.date.available2015-11-18T04:28:12Z
dc.date.issued2014-05-08
dc.identifier.citationPowell, J. R. and Sikes, B. A. (2014), Method or madness: does OTU delineation bias our perceptions of fungal ecology?. New Phytol, 202: 1095–1097. doi:10.1111/nph.12823en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/18938
dc.descriptionThis is the author's manuscript. The definitive version is available at www.newphytologist.comen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectAlpha diversityen_US
dc.subjectArbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungien_US
dc.subjectBeta diversityen_US
dc.subjectHigh-throughput sequencingen_US
dc.subjectNiche conservatismen_US
dc.subjectOperational taxonomic unit (OTU) delineationen_US
dc.subjectSpecies conceptsen_US
dc.titleMethod or madness: does OTU delineation bias our perceptions of fungal ecology?en_US
dc.typePreprint
kusw.kuauthorSikes, Benjamin A.
kusw.kudepartmentEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nph.12823
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Method_2014.pdf
Size:
312.7Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record