ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .
A Model of Rhetorical Legitimization and the Case of Quality Assessment in Higher Education
dc.contributor.advisor | Kunkel, Adrianne | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Ford, Debra | |
dc.contributor.author | Berry, Alison Nicole | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-17T04:13:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-06-17T04:13:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-12-31 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.other | http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:13750 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/18098 | |
dc.description.abstract | The Department of Education (DoE) and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) are regulatory agencies in the system of accreditation that influence both the quality and reputation of colleges and universities. Recent criticism (e.g., Butler, 2012; Obama, 2013b; Weissburg, 2009; Wellman, 1998) of accreditation processes in the United States and changing legislation (i.e., DoE, 2014e) brought attention to how stakeholders perceived these organizations. This dissertation explored the accreditation-related, web-based rhetoric of the DoE and CHEA to uncover how these organizations responded to stakeholder concerns regarding higher educational quality assessment. Grounded in legitimacy theory (Chung, 2010), a Rhetorical Legitimization Model was developed to illustrate the strategies used by the DoE and CHEA. Both organizations: (1) employed the legitimizing strategy of isomorphism that encouraged regulatory legitimacy, (2) utilized impression management that encouraged pragmatic legitimacy, and (3) engaged in a dialogic approach that encouraged normative legitimacy. This study also found that, although the rhetorical strategies used by the organizations were strikingly similar, the DoE and CHEA varied in the utilization of impression management and a dialogic approach to legitimization. The results of this study likely provide valuable information to practitioners and researchers regarding how accreditation-related organizations utilize rhetoric to influence legitimacy. | |
dc.format.extent | 130 pages | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | University of Kansas | |
dc.rights | Copyright held by the author. | |
dc.subject | Communication | |
dc.subject | Higher education | |
dc.subject | Rhetoric | |
dc.subject | communication | |
dc.subject | education | |
dc.subject | higher education | |
dc.subject | legitimacy | |
dc.subject | rhetoric | |
dc.title | A Model of Rhetorical Legitimization and the Case of Quality Assessment in Higher Education | |
dc.type | Dissertation | |
dc.contributor.cmtemember | Hummert, Mary Lee | |
dc.contributor.cmtemember | Innocenti, Beth | |
dc.contributor.cmtemember | Schwoerer, Catherine | |
dc.thesis.degreeDiscipline | Communication Studies | |
dc.thesis.degreeLevel | Ph.D. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess |