Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSakamoto, Arthur
dc.contributor.authorKim, ChangHwan
dc.contributor.authorWoo, Hyeyoung
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-22T20:26:21Z
dc.date.available2015-04-22T20:26:21Z
dc.date.issued2012-04-05
dc.identifier.citationSakamoto, Arthur., Kim, ChangHwan., Woo, Hyeyoung. "An Empirical Test of Alternative Theories of Educational Stratification." Education Research International Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 708989, 11 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/708989.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/17482
dc.descriptionThis is the published version, also available here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/708989.en_US
dc.description.abstractA classic issue in education centers on the nature of the relationship between schooling and labor market outcomes. Three general theories of this relationship are the human capital view, the market signal view, and the credentialist view. All three approaches predict a positive association between education and wages, but they differ in regard to its underlying causes. We argue that these theories may be fundamentally differentiated in terms of their implications for productivity, and we provide some relevant findings using productivity data for US manufacturing industries from 1976 to 1996. The results most strongly support the market signal view which emphasizes the association between productivity and relative educational attainment due to the role of the latter in certifying more reliable and trainable workers.en_US
dc.publisherHindawi Publishing Corporationen_US
dc.titleAn Empirical Test of Alternative Theories of Educational Stratificationen_US
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorKim, ChangHwan
kusw.kudepartmentSociologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2012/708989
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher version
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record