Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSteeples, Don W.
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Gregory S.
dc.contributor.authorSchmeissner, Chris M.
dc.contributor.authorMacy, Brian
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-02T19:20:45Z
dc.date.available2015-04-02T19:20:45Z
dc.date.issued1999-05-01
dc.identifier.citationSteeples, D.M., Baker, G.S., Schmeissner, C.M. & and Macy B.K. (1999). ”Geophones on a board.” Geophones on a board, 64(3), 809-814. http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1444591en_US
dc.identifier.issn0016-8033
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/17299
dc.descriptionThis is the publisher's version, also available electronically from "http://library.seg.org".en_US
dc.description.abstractWe examined the feasibility of using seismic reflections to image the upper 10 m of the earth’s surface quickly and effectively by rigidly attaching geophones to a wooden board at 5-cm intervals. The shallow seismic reflection information obtained was equivalent to control‐test data gathered using classic, single‐geophone plants with identical 5-cm intervals. Tests were conducted using both a .22-caliber rifle source and a 30.06-rifle source. In both cases, the results were unexpected: in response to our use of small, high‐resolution seismic sources at offsets of a few meters, we found little intergeophone interference that could be attributed to the presence of the board. Furthermore, we noted very little difference in a 60-ms intra‐alluvial reflection obtained using standard geophone plants versus that obtained using board‐mounted geophones. For both sources, amplitude spectra were nearly identical for data gathered with and without the board. With the 30.06 source, filtering at high‐frequency passbands revealed a wave mode of unknown origin that appears to be related to the presence of the board; however, this mode did not interfere with the usefulness of the shallow‐reflection data. The results of these experiments suggest that deploying large numbers of closely spaced geophones simultaneously—perhaps even automatically—is possible. Should this method of planting geophones prove practical after further testing, the cost‐effectiveness of very shallow seismic reflection imaging may be enhanced. The technique also may be useful at greater reflector depths in situations employing bunched geophones. However, this approach may not be applicable in all circumstances because larger energy sources may induce interference between the geophones and produce undesirable modes of motion within the medium holding the geophones.en_US
dc.publisherSociety of Exploration Geophysicistsen_US
dc.titleGeophones on a boarden_US
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorSteeples, Don W.
kusw.kudepartmentGeologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1190/1.1444591
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher version
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record