KUKU

KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Representations of Indian history as tools for identity-relevant concerns: A cultural psychological analysis

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Mukherjee_ku_0099D_13583_DATA_1.pdf (922.5Kb)
    Issue Date
    2014-08-31
    Author
    Mukherjee, Sahana
    Publisher
    University of Kansas
    Format
    122 pages
    Type
    Dissertation
    Degree Level
    Ph.D.
    Discipline
    Psychology
    Rights
    This item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The present research utilizes a cultural psychological perspective and considers the extent to which representations of history reflect and promote identity-relevant concerns (i.e., national identification, perceptions of present-day injustice in Indian society). Across four studies, I adapt a situation sampling methodology to explore the bi-directional relationship between collective memory and national identity. Studies 1 and 2 examine how recollections of a national past, and preferential selections of particular historical representations are associated with national identification. As part of a free-recall task, participants in Study 1 (N = 55) generated three historical events that they considered as important and relevant for the study of Indian history. Results indicate that a majority of events generated reflected nation-glorifying themes, compared to events that focused on assassinations of national leaders and wrongdoing against Muslims (a subordinate group in India; critical events). There was a complete absence of events that explicitly focused on social injustices and wrongdoing (i.e., silenced events). Participants who identified more strongly with being Indian (vs. low identifiers) were more likely to generate glorifying events focusing on dominant group experiences (e.g., Hindu-focused) in their first response, compared to events focusing on wrongdoing against subordinate groups. Study 2 exposed the events generated (in Study 1) to a new sample of participants (N = 95) using a within-subjects design. To make up for the relative absence of events focusing on wrongdoing, I included four additional events (i.e., silenced events) in Study 2. Results indicate that participants considered glorifying events as more relevant/important compared to critical and silenced events. National identity moderated their ratings of historical events. Participants who strongly identified with being Indian (vs. low identifiers) considered glorifying events as more relevant, compared to critical and silenced events. Studies 3 and 4 examined the consequences of exposure to particular representations of history (selected from Studies 1 and 2). In Study 3 (N = 65) I utilized a between-subjects design and exposed participants to either glorifying events, critical events, or silenced events. Results indicate that, compared to glorifying events, critical and silenced events (i.e., those focusing on social injustices and wrongdoing) reduced national identification, and were more effective in promoting perception of injustice in present-day Indian society. Study 4 (N = 160) also utilized a between-subject design. I randomly assigned participants to either read critical events (same as Study 3), glorifying events focusing on independence from British colonization, glorifying events focusing on predominantly Hindu and pre-British era, or a control condition. Results indicate that participants in the critical events condition, compared to control condition and the two glorifying events conditions, reported lower national identification. The critical condition was also more effective in promoting perceptions of injustice, compared to the two glorifying conditions. Finally, there was evidence of a linear trend, suggesting that exposure to dominant group representations (i.e., Hindu-focused glorifying condition) led to lower perceptions of injustice, compared to exposure to critical events, and a baseline control condition. Together, these studies provide evidence of the bi-directional relationship between identity and memory. Discussion emphasizes the collective character of psychological experiences and its relevance to the study of injustice and oppression.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1808/16824
    Collections
    • Dissertations [4474]
    • Psychology Dissertations and Theses [459]

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    The University of Kansas
      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps