Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHall, Spencer R.
dc.contributor.authorLeibold, Mathew A.
dc.contributor.authorLytle, David A.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Val H.
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-23T18:02:51Z
dc.date.available2015-02-23T18:02:51Z
dc.date.issued2004-08-01
dc.identifier.citationSpencer R. Hall, Mathew A. Leibold, David A. Lytle, and Val H. Smith 2004. STOICHIOMETRY AND PLANKTONIC GRAZER COMPOSITION OVER GRADIENTS OF LIGHT, NUTRIENTS, AND PREDATION RISK. Ecology 85:2291–2301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/03-0471en_US
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/16742
dc.description.abstractMechanisms that explain shifts in species composition over environmental gradients continue to intrigue ecologists. Ecological stoichiometry has recently provided a new potential mechanism linking resource (light and nutrient) supply gradients to grazer performance via elemental food-quality mechanisms. More specifically, it predicts that light and nutrient gradients should determine the relative dominance of P-rich taxa, such as Daphnia, in grazer assemblages. We tested this hypothesis in pond mesocosms (cattle tanks) by creating gradients of resource supply and predation risk, to which we added diverse assemblages of algal producer and zooplankton grazer species. We then characterized the end-point composition of grazer assemblages and quantity and elemental food quality of edible algae. We found that somatically P-rich Daphnia only dominated grazer assemblages in high-nutrient, no-predator treatments. In these ecosystems, P sequestered in producers exceeded a critical concentration. However, other grazers having even higher body P content did not respond similarly. These grazers were often abundant in low-nutrient environments with poorer food quality. At face value, this result is problematic for ecological stoichiometry because body composition did not correctly predict response of these other species. However, two potential explanations could maintain consistency with stoichiometric principles: species could differentially use a high-P resource (bacteria), or body composition might not always directly correlate with nutrient demands of grazers. Although our data cannot differentiate between these explanations, both suggest potential avenues for future empirical and theoretical study.en_US
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_US
dc.rightsCopyright by the Ecological Society of America
dc.subjectDaphniaen_US
dc.subjectgrazersen_US
dc.subjectlighten_US
dc.subjectnutrientsen_US
dc.subjectphosphorusen_US
dc.subjectpredationen_US
dc.subjectpredation-risk gradientsen_US
dc.subjectresource-supply gradientsen_US
dc.subjectspecies compositionen_US
dc.subjectexplaining shifts inen_US
dc.subjectstoichiometryen_US
dc.subjectzooplanktonen_US
dc.titleStoichiometry and grazer community composition over gradients of light, nutrients, and predation risken_US
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorSmith, Val H.
kusw.kudepartmentEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1890/03-0471
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher version
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record