Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHawley, Patricia
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-18T20:43:31Z
dc.date.available2014-11-18T20:43:31Z
dc.date.issued1999-07-01
dc.identifier.citationHawley, Patricia. (1999). "Strategies of play and winning the game: A reply to Brian Vaughn." Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45(3):363-369. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23092577.
dc.identifier.issn0272-930X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/15792
dc.descriptionThis is the publisher's version, which is also available electronically from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23092577.
dc.description.abstractA functional approach to social dominance (i.e., resource control) advances important and unique developmental questions not suggested by structuralist approaches. The functional approach to social dominance emphasizes that behavior can be motivated by self-interest, and yet recognizes the relative advantage gained by individuals who pursue their own goals while balancing them (or appearing to balance them) with the goals of others (a question of social competence). The strategies (competent or incompetent) a child employs to control resources can affect developmental outcomes, as can the win—loss experiences of the child.
dc.publisherWayne State University Press
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/23092577
dc.titleStrategies of play and winning the game: A reply to Brian Vaughn
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorHawley, Patricia
kusw.kudepartmentPsychology
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher version
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record