KUKU

KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    An Exporatory Multiple-Case Study of Factors Promoting Hope, Engagement, and Well-Being in High-Performing Middle Schools

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Khan_ku_0099D_13059_DATA_1.pdf (1.234Mb)
    Issue Date
    2013-12-31
    Author
    Khan, Christina
    Publisher
    University of Kansas
    Format
    260 pages
    Type
    Dissertation
    Degree Level
    Ph.D.
    Discipline
    Psychology & Research in Education
    Rights
    This item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The purpose of this exploratory multiple-case study was to investigate the factors that facilitate the development of hope, engagement, and well-being in middle school students. The Gallup Student Poll (GSP; Lopez, Agrawal, & Calderon, 2010) is a 20-item measure that taps the constructs of hope, engagement, and well-being in students in grades 5-12. The GSP was administered in the fall of 2009 to 246,682 students in 905 schools in the United States and again in the fall of 2010 to 266,971 students in 1,043 schools in the United States (Calderon, 2011). Three middle schools that participated in the GSP in 2010 and scored in the upper quartile of the Readiness for the Future Index (RFI), the composite index of hope, engagement, and well-being scores, were selected and participated in this study. The research questions investigated (a) how schools used the data from the GSP, (b) how educators perceived they were influencing hope, engagement, and well-being in students, (c) what factors educators believed affected their intervention efforts, and (d) how schools compared with one another in their responses to the three previous questions. Twelve focus groups (four per school) were conducted with teams of teachers from each school. Observations of school climate were also conducted on the same day as the focus group at each school. Focus group transcripts and observation field notes were coded for themes. Data was analyzed using the constant comparative and triangulation methods for individual cases and cross-case analysis. The findings from the cross-case comparisons indicated that the schools varied in their approach to using the GSP data. Two meta-themes emerged concerning the strategies that educators in the three schools felt were effective in boosting hope, engagement, and well-being: (a) creating an environment that fosters positive interactions and (b) providing an array of support strategies. Within the meta-themes, patterns of sub-themes were also noted. Five strategies corresponding to the first meta-theme were identified: (a) creating a positive and supportive atmosphere, (b) building relationships with students, (c) communicating clear expectations with consistent responses, (d) encouraging positive peer interactions, and (e) enhancing staff well-being. In terms of the second meta-theme, five different strategies were reported: (a) providing adequate support staff (e.g., counselors, police officers, nurses), (b) offering numerous structured extracurricular activities, (c) offering many ways for students to obtain academic help, (d) collaborating with other staff members to problem-solve around obstacles to student success, and (e) using quality instructional practices. Educators identified several factors that they believed impacted their efforts to help students become more hopeful, engaged, and thriving students. These factors are organized within an ecological systems theory framework. A discussion of the limitations of the study and directions for future research are presented.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1808/15065
    Collections
    • Education Dissertations and Theses [1068]
    • Dissertations [4473]

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    The University of Kansas
      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps