Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPreacher, Kristopher J.
dc.contributor.authorRucker, Derek D.
dc.contributor.authorMacCallum, Robert C.
dc.contributor.authorNicewander, W. Alan
dc.date.accessioned2007-04-25T17:00:13Z
dc.date.available2007-04-25T17:00:13Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationPsychological Methods, 10, 178-192.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/1490
dc.description.abstractAnalysis of continuous variables sometimes proceeds by selecting individuals on the basis of extreme scores of a sample distribution and submitting only those extreme scores to further analysis. This sampling method is known as the extreme groups approach (EGA). EGA is often used to achieve greater statistical power in subsequent hypothesis tests. However, there are several largely unrecognized costs associated with EGA that must be considered. The authors illustrate the effects EGA can have on power, standardized effect size, reliability, model specification, and the interpretability of results. Finally, the authors discuss alternative procedures, as well as possible legitimate uses of EGA. The authors urge researchers, editors, reviewers, and consumers to carefully assess the extent to which EGA is an appropriate tool in their own research and in that of others.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded in part by National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant DA16883, awarded to Kristopher J. Preacher.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectextreme groupsen
dc.subjecttertile spliten
dc.subjectquartile spliten
dc.subjectdichotomizationen
dc.titleUse of the extreme groups approach: A critical reexamination and new recommendations
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record