ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .
The Science of Pronominal Usage: He and It in Co-Reference to Inanimate Objects in Late Middle English Texts on Alchemy
dc.contributor.author | Grund, Peter | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-03-25T20:17:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-03-25T20:17:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-12-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Grund, Peter. 2011. “The Science of Pronominal Usage: He and It in Co-Reference to Inanimate Objects in Late Middle English Texts on Alchemy.” Journal of English Linguistics 39(4): 335–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0075424210384225 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/13380 | |
dc.description | This is the author's accepted manuscript. The published version can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0075424210384225 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article explores the variation between he and it in coreference to inanimate entities (such as mercury, sulfur, and salt). Using alchemical texts from the fifteenth century as material, the article demonstrates that there was much more variation in pronominal reference in this period than has previously been shown. Of the possible explanations suggested by previous research, the earlier grammatical gender system and transference from Latin do not seem to play a role, while pronoun clustering and pronominal reanalysis appear to influence the quantitative distribution. The scale of individuation used by Siemund and Stenroos to explain similar usage is shown not to be a straightforward predictor. Other factors such as personification and perceived similarities between animate and inanimate entities may affect the degree of perceived individuation. The choice of he over she seems to be influenced by pronominal reanalysis and straightforward personification in some cases. In other instances, it is speculated that the he usage reflects (stereotypical) gender conceptions in the Middle Ages. | |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | |
dc.subject | Pronouns | |
dc.subject | Grammatical and natural gender | |
dc.subject | Reanalysis | |
dc.subject | Coreference | |
dc.subject | Scale of individuation | |
dc.subject | Personification | |
dc.subject | Pragmatics | |
dc.subject | Late middle english | |
dc.subject | Alchemical texts | |
dc.title | The Science of Pronominal Usage: He and It in Co-Reference to Inanimate Objects in Late Middle English Texts on Alchemy | |
dc.type | Article | |
kusw.kuauthor | Grund, Peter | |
kusw.kudepartment | English | |
kusw.oastatus | fullparticipation | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0075424210384225 | |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Center for Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies Scholarly Publications [546]
This collection contains publications by faculty affiliated with CREES. -
English Scholarly Works [317]