ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .
The Nature of Knowledge: Evidence and Evidentiality in the Witness Depositions from the Salem Witch Trials
dc.contributor.author | Grund, Peter | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-03-25T19:50:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-03-25T19:50:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-01-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Grund, Peter. 2012. “The Nature of Knowledge: Evidence and Evidentiality in the Witness Depositions from the Salem Witch Trials.” American Speech 87(1): 7–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00031283-1599941 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/13379 | |
dc.description | This is the author's accepted manuscript. Also available electronically at http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00031283-1599941 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article explores evidentiality (or the linguistic marking of source of information), a topic that has received little attention in studies on the history of English. Using witness depositions from the witch trials in Salem, Massachusetts, in 1692–93 as material, the article reveals that a number of linguistic features are used to indicate source of information, especially verb phrases (e.g., see, hear, tell) and prepositional phrases (e.g., to my knowledge, in my sight). It also shows that direct sensory experience and reports are the most common semantic categories of evidentiality in the documents, while inference and assumption are relatively uncommon. I argue that the depositions use evidential marking in different situations to fulfill a variety of pragmatic functions. For example, the witnesses refer to direct experience (seeing) of the affliction by the apparitions of alleged witches to bring greater credibility to allegations that could usually not be substantiated. More generally, the article demonstrates how concepts such as discourse community, setting, and pragmatic concerns, which have not been systematically considered in studies on early English in North America, are crucial factors for our understanding of the use of English in the period. | |
dc.publisher | Duke University Press | |
dc.title | The Nature of Knowledge: Evidence and Evidentiality in the Witness Depositions from the Salem Witch Trials | |
dc.type | Article | |
kusw.kuauthor | Grund, Peter | |
kusw.kudepartment | English | |
kusw.oastatus | fullparticipation | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1215/00031283-1599941 | |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
English Scholarly Works [317]