dc.contributor.author | Artiles, Alfredo J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kozleski, Elizabeth B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dorn, Sherman | |
dc.contributor.author | Christensen, Carol | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-02-10T17:23:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-02-10T17:23:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006-01-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Artiles, A., Kozleski, E. B., Dorn, S., & Christensen, C. (2007). Learning in inclusive education research: Remediating theory and methods with a transformative agenda. Review of Research in Education, 30, 1-30. Reprinted in : In Hick, P., & Thomas, G. (Eds.). (2008). Inclusion and diversity in education. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0091732X030001065 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/13042 | |
dc.description | This is the author's accepted manuscript. The original publication is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0091732X030001065. | |
dc.description.abstract | In theory, inclusive education is about all students and focuses on student presence, participation, acceptance, and achievement. In practice, inclusive education is multiplicity of discourses and practices. Historically, inclusive education is situated within waves of evolution. The first wave saw the establishment of general rights for children with disabilities, but some children—especially those with behavioral problems and severe intellectual disabilities—remained unrecognized outsiders in schools and school communities. Subsequent waves of inclusive education have had differential impacts in developed and developing countries. A review of primarily U.S. and British inclusive education research at the school and classroom levels identified four shortcomings: inclusive education theory has outpaced its practice; inclusive education research ignores the influences of globalization forces; inclusive education theorization lacks conceptual clarity; and a substantial gap between the views of learning that informs research conducted either at the classroom level or the school level. In addition, views of learning in classroom and school based studies rely on different theoretical stipulations. Lack of cross-fertilization between classroom- and school-based inclusive education research is a missed opportunity for enriching this emerging knowledge base. Recommended is a re-mediation in the relationship between researchers and their work with theories that offer a systematic understanding of the cultural and political nature of learning. | |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | |
dc.title | Learning in Inclusive Education Research: Re-Mediating Theory and Methods with a Transformative Agenda | |
dc.type | Article | |
kusw.kuauthor | Kozleski, Elizabeth B. | |
kusw.kudepartment | Special Education | |
kusw.oastatus | na | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3102/0091732X030001065 | |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscript | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |