Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Publication

Is Adjudication a Public Good?: “Overcrowded Courts” and the Private-Sector Alternative of Arbitration

Ware, Stephen J.
Citations
Altmetric:
Abstract
One way to end the public subsidy for cases that do not deserve it is for courts to charge the parties to such a case a fee high enough to reimburse the court for its costs of adjudicating the case. Several thoughtful commentators have proposed such “user fees.” This Article assesses those proposals and suggests that user fees would make litigation look more like arbitration. It concludes by considering the possibility that the public-sector court system and private arbitration organizations could compete in the market for unsubsidized adjudication and in the market for subsidized adjudication. In short, this Article places discussions of overcrowded courts and court user fees in the context of a society — our society — with a strong private sector alternative to our courts.
Description
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.
Date
2013-07-11
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Litigation, User fees, Arbitration, Adjudication
Citation
Stephen J. Ware, Is Adjudication a Public Good?: 'Overcrowded Courts' and the Private-Sector Alternative of Arbitration, 14 CARDOZO J. CONFLICT RESOL. 899 (2013).
14 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 899 (2013)
DOI
Embedded videos