Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBrown, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorRausch, Lisa
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-29T17:23:07Z
dc.date.available2013-09-29T17:23:07Z
dc.date.issued2013-05-31
dc.date.submitted2013
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:12627
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/12281
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this dissertation is to describe and analyze one set of efforts to improve monitoring, licensing, accountability, and socio-environmental outcomes of industrial-scale farming in the Cerrado, located in Brazil's southern Amazon. These efforts are collectively called Lucas do Rio Verde Legal [Lucas Legal], an environmental licensing initiative which is the product of a multi-stakeholder partnership. This partnership includes an international environmental NGO, national and multi-national industrial agriculture firms, and local government agencies. Environmental issues in the Cerrado are frequently framed as economic, and, to a lesser extent, policy issues, due to the high profitability of industrial agriculture in the region and shortcomings on the part of the state to adequately monitor rural activities and enforce environmental laws. Lucas Legal is novel not only for its relative successes at improving the effectiveness of environmental licensing of rural properties locally and at the state level, but also for its role in increasing the interest of rural producers in addressing environmental issues and for calling attention to cultural, historical, institutional, and technical factors that contribute to agri-environmental problems in the Amazon. A multi-method approach, including archival research, ethnographic research, ongoing interviews with key informants, and a semi-structured survey of 20 farmers was used to explore the genesis and outcomes of Lucas Legal from many different angles, and to trace the history of the project and understand the unique history of the municipality (Lucas do Rio Verde) in which the project began. Analysis of the project drew on three distinct literatures - the literature on Environmental Governance; the literature on Environmentality, which is heavily based on Foucault's work on Governmentality; and the combined literatures on Advocacy and Discourse Coalitions. While none of these literatures was sufficient alone to explain the unique history and outcomes of Lucas Legal, the three literatures together offer useful insights into the contributions of different government, market, and civil society stakeholder groups. The grounded, ethnographic approach of this dissertation research helps fill an important gap in knowledge on this topic; few other studies of environmental governance in the Amazon have been in-depth enough to explore the settlement history of the region, the importance of inter-personal relationships and local politics to environmental and developmental outcomes, and to link these issues to outcomes of projects of environmental governance or local perceptions of environmental conservation. Understanding the diverse motivations of agricultural and non-agricultural actors in the Amazon is crucial to ensuring sustainable environmental outcomes as well as sustainable economic development.
dc.format.extent415 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
dc.subjectGeography
dc.subjectPublic policy
dc.subjectEnvironmental management
dc.subjectBrazil
dc.subjectCerrado
dc.subjectEnvironmentality
dc.subjectEnvironmental licensing
dc.subjectIndustrial agriculture
dc.subjectMato grosso
dc.titleEnvironmental Governance as a Development Strategy: The Case of Lucas do Rio Verde Legal
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.cmtememberMyers, Garth A.
dc.contributor.cmtememberLi, Xingong
dc.contributor.cmtememberObadare, Ebenezer
dc.contributor.cmtememberMetz, Brent E.
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineGeography
dc.thesis.degreeLevelPh.D.
kusw.oastatusna
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
kusw.bibid8086106
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record