Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTurnbull, H. Rutherford, III
dc.contributor.authorTurnbull, Ann P.
dc.contributor.authorStrickland, Bonnie
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-19T17:46:32Z
dc.date.available2013-07-19T17:46:32Z
dc.date.issued1979
dc.identifier.citationTurnbull III, H. Rutherford, Ann Turnbull, and Bonnie Strickland. "Procedural Due Process: The Two-edged Sword That the Untrained Should Not Unsheath." Journal of Education 161 (1979): 40-59.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/11510
dc.description.abstractThe issue of procedural due process is examined in this article by first analyzing the associated legal requirements of P.L. 94-142 and then identifying the "triggers" which professionals and parents can use to initiate a due process hearing. Problems and unresolved issues associated with interpreting and applying due process safeguards in terms of initiating, conducting, and governing the hearing and hearing officer are discussed. The concluding section of the article identifies specific training implications and creeds of due process hearing officers.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherBioinfo Publications
dc.titleProcedural Due Process: The Two-edged Sword That the Untrained Should Not Unsheath
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorTurnbull, Ann
kusw.kuauthorTurnbull, H. Rutherford
kusw.kudepartmentSpecial Education
kusw.oastatusfullparticipation
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher version
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record