Combating Terrorism in Central Asia: Explaining Differences in States' Responses to Terror

Abstract

This work examines differences in the level of violence of counterterrorism measures adopted by Central Asian states. Why do some Central Asian governments opt for wanton repression in the name of the struggle with terrorism, while others adopt less severe methods of control and prevention? To answer this question, the study draws on a synthesis of rationalist and constructivist explanations. Like rationalists, it posits that the magnitude of terrorism and states’ material capabilities affect the governments’ responses to terrorism. Following constructivists, the study stresses the impact of ideas about the nature of terrorist threat, and views on the appropriateness of the use of force on counterterrorism policies of Central Asian states.