KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Reducing Pausing at Rich-to-Lean Schedule Transitions: Effects of Variable-Ratio Schedules and Noncontingent Timeouts

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Brewer_ku_0099D_12368_DATA_1.pdf (1.737Mb)
    Issue Date
    2012-08-31
    Author
    Brewer, Adam Thornton
    Publisher
    University of Kansas
    Format
    99 pages
    Type
    Dissertation
    Degree Level
    Ph.D.
    Discipline
    Applied Behavioral Science
    Rights
    This item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Transitions from relatively rich to lean conditions of reinforcement often produce extended pausing because this transition is relatively more aversive than other transition types (e.g., rich-rich, lean-lean, and lean-rich). In applied settings, aversive rich-lean transitions may underlie maladaptive aberrant behavior (e.g., self-injury, aggression, and severe stereotypy). Reducing the aversiveness of this critical transition is of basic and applied interest. The length of the pause may be used as an index of the aversive stimulation at rich-lean transitions and as an analog measure of aberrant behavior in clinical settings. Experiment 1 investigated the effects of arranging rich-lean transitions between variable-ratio (VR) schedules or random-ratio (RR) schedules on pausing at rich-lean transitions in four pigeons. Variable- and random-ratio schedules were equally effective at reducing pausing at rich-lean transitions. These results suggest that the aversive stimulation at rich-lean transitions was reduced with variable schedules. The applied implication is that aberrant behavior should be less likely to occur at rich-lean transitions when variable schedules are arranged. In Experiment 2, four transitions were separated by a timeout period imposed between the end of the reinforcer and before the start of the next multiple-schedule component. During the timeout, the response key was darkened and the reinforcement schedule was suspended until the timeout interval had elapsed. Across different timeout durations, ratio sizes, and probes, the timeout produced inconsistent within- and between-subject results. Inconsistent results may be attributable to the timeout reducing the number of transitions completed, performance failing to meet the quantitative and qualitative stability criteria, and insufficient reinforcement in the lean-schedule component. An interesting possibility raised by Experiment 2 is that the multiple schedule may have "chain-like" features (e.g., access to a rich-schedule component), which may maintain responding in the lean component when there is insufficient reinforcement.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1808/10267
    Collections
    • Dissertations [2980]
    • Applied Behavioral Science Dissertations and Theses [114]

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps