Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorReinardy, Scott
dc.contributor.authorGrimmer, Kristen E.
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-27T11:17:25Z
dc.date.available2012-10-27T11:17:25Z
dc.date.issued2012-05-31
dc.date.submitted2012
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:12185
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/10231
dc.description.abstractAbstract This study uses a quantitative content analysis to determine the framing used by U.S. mainstream newspapers in media coverage of the 2011 Egyptian protests. The study examined 153 stories from The New York Times and The Washington Post. The study focuses on how sources framed the protests, former President Hosni Mubarak, and the effects the protests had on both Egypt and the United States. The analysis reveals that the viewpoints of U.S. official sources were overrepresented in news coverage and framed the conflict overall in a neutral light. The analysis also revealed that U.S. foreign policy towards Egypt and the remedies endorsed by U.S. official sources during two-weeks of news coverage was uncertain.
dc.format.extent61 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
dc.subjectMass communication
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.subjectFraming
dc.subjectGatekeeping
dc.subjectIndexing
dc.subjectSource
dc.titleDoes Policy lead Mainstream Media? How Sources Framed the 2011 Egyptian Protests
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.cmtememberBarnett, Barbara
dc.contributor.cmtememberWard, Doug
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineJournalism
dc.thesis.degreeLevelM.S.
kusw.oastatusna
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record