ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorImber, Michael
dc.contributor.authorDandoy, Jason Robert
dc.description.abstractAbstract The purpose of this study is to determine which factors influence items that school principals consider "barriers" to dismissal of "incompetent" or "poor performing" teachers. This study determines if specific characteristics of schools, principals, or a combination of the two can predict the specific barriers cited by principals as the reasons for renewing contracts of poor performing teachers. By identifying causes for the tolerance of poor-performing teachers, school officials and educational institutions may take a more proactive approach to training principals and hopefully prevent the repetition of this problematic administrative behavior. Data from the 2007-2008 Schools and Staffing Survey is used to provide insight into the quantitative study questions. In this survey, principals indicated items that they considered to be barriers to dismissal of poor-performing teachers. Items that principals considered to be barriers to dismissal serve as the outcome variables. Characteristics of schools and school administrators serve as the predicting variables. Questions are answered within the educational and legal context that permits and restrains the ability of a school district to make contract decisions based on teacher performance. Major findings of this study identify that principals cite "union presence", "tenure", "length of time", and "effort required for documentation" as the most common barriers to dismissal of poor-performing teachers. In order to decrease the presence of these barriers, this study found that principal training and district support are important; specifically, involvement in professional development for principals and involvement by curriculum specialists. Principals who were enthusiastic and motivated to do their jobs also reported the presence of barriers less frequently. Those who were tired of the work, had dissatisfied staffs, or lacked enthusiasm were more burdened by the challenges of removing low-performing teachers. Of the barriers studied, few characteristics of principals or schools assisted in reducing the principals' reports that union presence created a barrier. Conclusions of this study suggest that district administrators need to take a proactive approach to ensuring that principals receive support and maintain enthusiasm to do the work. Providing professional development to principals, specifically in the areas of staff evaluation, is a recommendation. Supporting principals with curriculum specialists or other district administrators will also aid in the reduction of barriers to dismissal of poor-performing teachers.
dc.format.extent78 pages
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsThis item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author.
dc.subjectEducational administration
dc.contributor.cmtememberEpp, Charles
dc.contributor.cmtememberSaatcioglu, Argun
dc.contributor.cmtememberPierce, Ardith
dc.contributor.cmtememberPerkins, Perry
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineEducational Leadership and Policy Studies
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record