ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .
Bi-factor Multidimensional Item Response Theory Modeling for Subscores Estimation, Reliability, and Classification
dc.contributor.advisor | Skorupski, William P | |
dc.contributor.author | Md Desa, Zairul Nor Deana | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-28T11:21:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-28T11:21:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-08-31 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.other | http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:12360 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/10126 | |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, there has been increasing interest in estimating and improving subscore reliability. In this study, the multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) and the bi-factor model were combined to estimate subscores, to obtain subscores reliability, and subscores classification. Both the compensatory and partially compensatory MIRT models are defined with bi-factor structure. A Monte Carlo study with 1,500 examinees was carried out for each model to examine two different test lengths (30 and 60 items) and five levels of item discrimination between primary and specific abilities (.50, .75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.50). The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) with the Gibbs sampling method was applied to simultaneously estimate the expected a posteriori (EAP) subscores for primary and specific ability dimensions. Results were evaluated in light of estimation accuracy and fit, subscore reliability based on the Bayesian marginal reliability, and subscore classification based on subscore separation index. Despite a very minimum computing intensity for the MCMC simulation, both bi-factor compensatory and bi-factor partially compensatory models produced higher subscores reliability resulted from lower bias and reduction in the error variance of EAP subscores in all ability dimensions. These improved subscores reliability that also arrived at a higher discrimination level and for a longer test. This study found the bi-factor compensatory model to show better potential in classifying the magnitude of distinction between specific abilities and primary ability. Whereas, the bi-factor partially compensatory minimized the classification of subscores between the specific and primary abilities. | |
dc.format.extent | 162 pages | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | University of Kansas | |
dc.rights | This item is protected by copyright and unless otherwise specified the copyright of this thesis/dissertation is held by the author. | |
dc.subject | Educational tests & measurements | |
dc.subject | Quantitative psychology | |
dc.subject | Psychometrics | |
dc.subject | Educational psychology | |
dc.subject | Bayesian approach | |
dc.subject | Bi-factor model | |
dc.subject | Multidimensional item response theory | |
dc.subject | Subscores reliability | |
dc.title | Bi-factor Multidimensional Item Response Theory Modeling for Subscores Estimation, Reliability, and Classification | |
dc.type | Dissertation | |
dc.contributor.cmtemember | Kingston, Neal | |
dc.contributor.cmtemember | Frey, Bruce | |
dc.contributor.cmtemember | Peyton, Vicki | |
dc.contributor.cmtemember | Woods, Carol | |
dc.thesis.degreeDiscipline | Psychology & Research in Education | |
dc.thesis.degreeLevel | Ph.D. | |
kusw.oastatus | na | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
kusw.bibid | 8085781 | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Dissertations [4889]
-
Education Dissertations and Theses [1065]