| dc.contributor.author | Turnbull, H. Rutherford, III | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wilcox, Brennan L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stowe, Matthew J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Carolyn, Raper | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hedges, Laura Penny | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-16T19:34:17Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-04-16T19:34:17Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2000 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Turnbull, H.R., Wilcox, B.L., Stowe, M., Raper, C., & Hedges, L.P. (2000). Public policy foundations for positive behavioral interventions, strategies, and supports. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2(4), 218-230. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/109830070000200406 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/6149 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This article examines precedents that justify Congress in creating a preference for positive behavioral interventions, strategies, and supports over other interventions in the 1997 Amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The authors concluded that the IDEA 1997 provisions are warranted by several well-established precedents based in constitutional law, in the right to treatment and the right to education cases, in moral philosophy, and in democratic-government philosophy. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions | |
| dc.title | Public Policy Foundations for Positive Behavioral Interventions, Strategies, and Supports | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| kusw.kuauthor | Turnbull, H. Rutherford | |
| kusw.kudepartment | Beach Center on Disability | |
| kusw.oastatus | fullparticipation | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/109830070000200406 | |
| kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, publisher version | |
| kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |
