KUKU

KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Slavic, German, and Eurasian Studies
    • Slovene Linguistic Studies
    • Slovene Linguistic Studies. Volume 3, 2001
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Slavic, German, and Eurasian Studies
    • Slovene Linguistic Studies
    • Slovene Linguistic Studies. Volume 3, 2001
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Slovensko-angleška protistavna analiza nedoločnika v vlogi osebkovega oz. povedkovega določila

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    302Kocijancic_Sustarsic.pdf (1.001Mb)
    Issue Date
    2001-01-01
    Author
    Kocijančič Pokorn, Nike
    Šuštaršič, Rastislav
    Publisher
    ZRC SAZU / Hall Center for the Humanities
    Type
    Article
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    SLOVENE: Protistavna analiza nedoločnika v vlogi osebkovega določila oz. povedkovega določila je skušala ugotoviti, katere so najpogostejše strukture v slovenščini, ki ohranjajo ali zamenjujejo angleški nedoločnik v tej vlogi v leposlovnih besedilih. Osnovni korpus za analizo je sestavljalo pet angleških leposlovnih besedil in njihovih prevodov v slovenščino. Za predstavitev rezultatov analize je bilo potrebno uvesti nov izraz osebkovo določilo kot prevedek izraza ‘subject complement', ker strokovno izrazje in klasifikacja angleškega slovničnega sistema ne ustrezata v celoti slovnični terminologiji in določitvam, ki so se uveljavile v slovenskem prostoru.

    Osnovne hipoteze protistavne analize, ki je primerjala rabo nedoločnika v vlogi osebkovega določila v angleških besedilih z ustreznicami v slovenskih prevodih, so bile, da v določenih primerih raba nedoločnika v slovenščini popolnoma ustreza rabi v angleščini, da v določenih primerih rabe nedoločnika v angleščini v slovenščini ne moremo uporabiti nedoločnika, temveč navadno uporabimo osebno glagolsko obliko v prostem ali odvisnem stavku ter da v slovenščini pogosteje segamo po osebni glagolski obliki tudi v primerih, ko je možno uporabiti bodisi nedoločnik bodisi osebno glagolsko obliko.

    Rezultati raziskave so pokazali, da je raba nedoločnika v vlogi osebkovega določila redka že v angleških leposlovnih besedilih, še bolj pa v prevodih leposlovnih besedil v slovenščini. V skladu s prvo podmeno se je izkazalo, da v slovenskih prevodih leposlovnih besedil v določenih primerih raba nedoločnika popolnoma ustreza rabi v angleščini. Prav tako so rezultati potrdili predvidevanje, da v določenih primerih rabe nedoločnika v angleščini prevajalci uporabljajo v slovenščini osebno glagolsko obliko v prostem ali odvisnem stavku. In končno, dejstvo, da prevajalci raje segajo po osebni glagolski obliki v prevodu tudi takrat, ko bi bil prevod z nedoločnikom sprejemljiv, je potrdilo pričakovano večjo pogostnost osebne glagolske oblike v slovenskih prevedkih angleškega nedoločnika v vlogi osebkovega določila.

    ENGLISH: An English-Slovene contrastive analysis of the infinitve in the function of subject complement has attempted to determine the most frequently chosen equivalents in Slovene literary translations corresponding to the English subject complement realized by the infinitive or the infinitival clause. As the material for analysis five English literary texts and their translations into Slovene were used. The analysis demanded some terminological innovation: the term osebkovo določilo for 'subject complement' was introduced since the terminology and classification of the English grammatical system do not correspond completely to those of the 1984 Slovene grammar.

    The basic hypotheses of the English-Slovene contrastive analysis of the subject complement realized by the infinitive were the following: in some cases the Slovene use of the infinitive in this function fully corresponds to that of English, in some cases the use of the infinitive is not possible in Slovene and the finite verb form is used instead, and finally, in most cases the finite verb form is used in Slovene even when the infinitive is also possible.

    The results of the analysis have shown that the infinitive in the function of subject complement is rare in English literary texts and even more so in Slovene translations. The analysis has confirmed the assumptions that in some cases the use of the infinitive in Slovene translations fully corresponds to that of English, and that in the majority of cases the Slovene translators used finite verb forms for English infinitives. The analysis has also confirmed the assumption that Slovene translators prefer finite verb forms even when the translation with the infinitive is possible and thus established that the English infinitive as subject complement is usually rendered by the finite verb form in Slovene translations.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1808/827
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.17161/SLS.1808.827
    Collections
    • Slovene Linguistic Studies. Volume 3, 2001 [10]
    Citation
    Slovenski jezik / Slovene Linguistic Studies 3 http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/SLS.1808.827

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    The University of Kansas
      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps