Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVit, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorvan der Meulen, Jane
dc.contributor.authorDiaz, Maria
dc.contributor.authorPedro, Silvia R.M.
dc.contributor.authorEsperança, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorZakaria, Rahimah
dc.contributor.authorBeckh, Gudrun
dc.contributor.authorMaza, Favian
dc.contributor.authorMeccia, Gina
dc.contributor.authorEngel, Michael S.
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-10T15:43:02Z
dc.date.available2023-05-10T15:43:02Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationVit, P., van der Meulen, J., Diaz, M., Pedro, S. R. M., Esperança, I., Zakaria, R., Beckh, G., Maza, F., Meccia, G., & Engel, M. S. (2022). Impact of genus (Geotrigona, Melipona, Scaptotrigona) in the targeted 1H-NMR organic profile, and authenticity test by interphase emulsion of honey processed in cerumen pots by stingless bees in Ecuador. Current research in food science, 6, 100386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2022.11.005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1808/34152
dc.description.abstractThe biodiversity of Ecuadorian stingless bees is almost 200 species. Traditional pot-honey harvest in Ecuador is mostly done from nests of the three genera selected here Geotrigona Moure, 1943, Melipona Illiger, 1806, and Scaptotrigona Moure, 1942. The 20 pot-honey samples collected from cerumen pots and three ethnic honeys “abeja de tierra”, “bermejo”, and “cushillomishki” were analyzed for qualitative and quantitative targeted 1H-NMR honey profiling, and for the Honey Authenticity Test by Interphase Emulsion (HATIE). Extensive data of targeted organic compounds (41 parameters) were identified, quantified, and described. The three honey types were compared by ANOVA. Amino acids, ethanol, hydroxymethylfurfural, aliphatic organic acids, sugars, and markers of botanical origin. The number of phases observed with the HATIE were one in Scaptotrigona and three in Geotrigona and Melipona honeys. Acetic acid (19.60 ± 1.45 g/kg) and lactic acid (24.30 ± 1.65 g/kg) were particularly high in Geotrigona honey (in contrast to 1.3 g/kg acetic acid and 1.6 g/kg lactic acid in Melipona and Scaptotrigona), and with the lowest fructose + glucose (18.39 ± 1.68) g/100g honey compared to Melipona (52.87 ± 1.75) and Scaptotrigona (52.17 ± 0.60). Three local honeys were tested using PCA (Principal Component Analysis), two were assigned with a correct declared bee origin, but “bermejo” was not a Melipona and grouped with the Scaptotrigona cluster. However after HCA (Hierarchical Cluster Analysis) the three honeys were positioned in the Melipona-Scaptotrigona cluster. This research supports targeted 1H-NMR-based profiling of pot-honey metabolomics approach for multi-parameter visualization of organic compounds, as well as descriptive and pertained multivariate statistics (HCA and PCA) to discriminate the stingless bee genus in a set of Geotrigona, Melipona and Scaptotrigona honey types. The NMR characterization of Ecuadorian honey produced by stingless bees emphasizes the need for regulatory norms. A final note on stingless bee markers in pot-honey metabolites which should be screened for those that may extract phylogenetic signals from nutritional traits of honey. Scaptotrigona vitorum honey revealed biosurfactant activity in the HATIE, originating a fingerprint Honey Biosurfactant Test (HBT) for the genus in this set of pot-honeys.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_US
dc.subjectGeotrigonaen_US
dc.subjectHATIEen_US
dc.subjectHBTen_US
dc.subjectMeliponaen_US
dc.subjectMeliponinien_US
dc.subjectTargeted 1H-NMRen_US
dc.subjectPot-honeyen_US
dc.subjectScaptotrigonaen_US
dc.subjectStingless beesen_US
dc.titleImpact of genus (Geotrigona, Melipona, Scaptotrigona) on the targeted 1H-NMR organic profile, and authenticity test by interphase emulsion of honey processed in cerumen pots by stingless bees in Ecuadoren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorEngel, Michael S.
kusw.kudepartmentEcology & Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.crfs.2022.11.005en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4951-9404en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC9947262en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.