Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCabarkapa, Dimitrije
dc.contributor.authorCabarkapa, Damjana V.
dc.contributor.authorPhilipp, Nicolas M.
dc.contributor.authorEserhaut, Drake A.
dc.contributor.authorDowney, Gabriel G.
dc.contributor.authorFry, Andrew C.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-14T15:42:47Z
dc.date.available2023-02-14T15:42:47Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-30
dc.identifier.citationCabarkapa, D.; Cabarkapa, D.V.; Philipp, N.M.; Eserhaut, D.A.; Downey, G.G.; Fry, A.C. Impact of Distance and Proficiency on Shooting Kinematics in Professional Male Basketball Players. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2022, 7, 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk7040078en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/33788
dc.description.abstractShooting efficiency is one of the key performance parameters related to securing the desired game outcome at various levels of basketball competition, and it is largely influenced by the biomechanical adjustments incorporated during the preparatory and release phase of the shooting motion. Thus, the purpose of the present study was twofold: (a) to examine the differences in the kinematic characteristics between free-throw, two-point, and three-point shots, and (b) to examine the differences between shooters with excellent (≥80%) and good (<80%) levels of shooting proficiency. A total of 10 professional male basketball players performed 5 free-throw (4.57 m), two-point (5.18 m), and three-point (6.75 m) shots, combining for a total of 150 shots. A high-definition camera recording at 120 fps was used to capture the shooting motion from a sagittal point of view, and video analysis software was used to analyze the kinematic variables of interest. The findings of the present study reveal that the kinematic characteristics during the preparatory phase of the shooting motion remain unchanged between free-throw and two-point shots. Three-point shots required lower elbow positioning, influenced by greater knee and hip flexion when compared to free-throw and two-point shots. The release angle was notably lower for shots attempted beyond the three-point line but remained unchanged between the free-throw and two-point shooting motions. Release height and vertical displacement were significantly greater for two- and three-point shots when compared to free-throw shots, while no difference was observed between the two- and three-point shots. In addition, no significant differences in shooting kinematics were observed between those participants with excellent and good levels of shooting proficiency.en_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rights© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectSporten_US
dc.subjectCoachingen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectFree-throwen_US
dc.subjectTwo-pointen_US
dc.subjectThree-pointen_US
dc.titleImpact of Distance and Proficiency on Shooting Kinematics in Professional Male Basketball Playersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorCabarkapa, Dimitrije
kusw.kuauthorCabarkapa, Damjana V.
kusw.kuauthorPhilipp, Nicolas M.
kusw.kuauthorEserhaut, Drake A.
kusw.kuauthorDowney, Gabriel G.
kusw.kuauthorFry, Andrew C.
kusw.kudepartmentHealth, Sport, & Exercise Sciencesen_US
kusw.kudepartmentJayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratoryen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jfmk7040078en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9912-3251en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4680-0313en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8171-7684en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC9590067en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.