Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHursh, Steven R.
dc.contributor.authorStrickland, Justin C.
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Lindsay P.
dc.contributor.authorReed, Derek D.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-17T18:15:13Z
dc.date.available2022-01-17T18:15:13Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-03
dc.identifier.citationHursh SR, Strickland JC, Schwartz LP and Reed DD (2020) Quantifying the Impact of Public Perceptions on Vaccine Acceptance Using Behavioral Economics. Front. Public Health 8:608852. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.608852en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/32404
dc.description.abstractThis study was conducted to evaluate the impact of public perceptions of vaccine safety and efficacy on intent to seek COVID-19 vaccination using hypothetical vaccine acceptance scenarios. The behavioral economic methodology could be used to inform future public health vaccination campaigns designed to influence public perceptions and improve public acceptance of the vaccine. In June 2020, 534 respondents completed online validated behavioral economic procedures adapted to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine demand in relation to a hypothetical development process and efficacy. An exponential demand function was used to describe the proportion of participants accepting the vaccine at each efficacy. Linear mixed effect models evaluated development process and individual characteristic effects on minimum required vaccine efficacy required for vaccine acceptance. The rapid development process scenario increased the rate of decline in acceptance with reductions in efficacy. At 50% efficacy, 68.8% of respondents would seek the standard vaccine, and 58.8% would seek the rapid developed vaccine. Rapid vaccine development increased the minimum required efficacy for vaccine acceptance by over 9 percentage points, γ = 9.36, p < 0.001. Past-3-year flu vaccination, γ = −23.00, p < 0.001, and male respondents, γ = −4.98, p = 0.037, accepted lower efficacy. Respondents reporting greater conspiracy beliefs, γ = 0.39, p < 0.001, and political conservatism, γ = 0.32, p < 0.001, required higher efficacy. Male, γ = −4.43, p = 0.013, and more conservative, γ = −0.09, p = 0.039, respondents showed smaller changes in minimum required efficacy by development process. Information on the vaccine development process, vaccine efficacy, and individual differences impact the proportion of respondents reporting COVID-19 vaccination intentions. Behavioral economics provides an empirical method to estimate vaccine demand to target subpopulations resistant to vaccination.en_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rights© 2020 Hursh, Strickland, Schwartz and Reed. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectVaccineen_US
dc.subjectVaccinationen_US
dc.subjectDemanden_US
dc.subjectBehavioral economicsen_US
dc.titleQuantifying the Impact of Public Perceptions on Vaccine Acceptance Using Behavioral Economicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorReed, Derek D.
kusw.kudepartmentApplied Behavioral Scienceen_US
kusw.kudepartmentCofrin Logan Center for Addiction Research and Treatmenten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpubh.2020.608852en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC7744757en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 Hursh, Strickland, Schwartz and Reed. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: © 2020 Hursh, Strickland, Schwartz and Reed. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).