Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaechele, Alex
dc.contributor.authorSlusky, David
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-09T18:19:24Z
dc.date.available2017-11-09T18:19:24Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-03
dc.identifier.citationAlex Kaechele & David J. G. Slusky. 2017. Applied Economics Lettersen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/25310
dc.descriptionThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Applied Economics Letters on November 3, 2017. Available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13504851.2017.1397849.en_US
dc.description.abstractSince 2011, gas prices have fallen 43%, raising the question of how different communities adjust their vehicle miles traveled. Data from the National Household Travel Survey’s EPA fuel economy database and the Energy Information Administration database are used to measure consumers’ elasticity to changes in gas prices. We find no significant difference between the price elasticity of individuals in cities with rail access and those without. Furthermore, we are able to rule out an elasticity in those with rail that is greater than 0.61, suggesting that rail access does not make consumer demand elastic.en_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectGas pricesen_US
dc.subjectVehicle milesen_US
dc.subjectRailen_US
dc.titleWith and without the tracks: how railroad access impacts gas price elasticityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorKaechele, Alex
kusw.kuauthorSlusky, David
kusw.kudepartmentEconomicsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13504851.2017.1397849en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8626-5189
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscripten_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record