ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .
The Centrist Case Against Current (Conservative) Arbitration Law
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-01T18:32:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-01T18:32:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-03-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | The Centrist Case against Current (Conservative) Arbitration Law, 68 FLORIDA LAW REVIEW 1227 (2016). | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/24886 | |
dc.description.abstract | In The Politics of Arbitration Law and Centrist Proposals for Reform, I explained how issues surrounding consumer and other adhesive arbitration agreements became divisive along predictable political lines (progressives vs. conservatives) and proposed an intermediate (or centrist) position to resolve those issues. However, The Politics of Arbitration Law did not argue the case for my proposals. It left those arguments for this Article, which makes the case against current (conservative) arbitration law, and a third article, which will make the case against progressive proposals to reform arbitration law. In other words, this Article stands out from the many other articles critiquing current arbitration law because this Article’s critique comes from a centrist, rather than progressive, perspective. For that reason, this Article’s critique may be more likely than progressive critiques to gain traction with lawmakers. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Florida Law Review | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol68/iss5/1/ | en_US |
dc.subject | Arbitration | en_US |
dc.subject | Consumer politics | |
dc.subject | Employment | |
dc.subject | Adhesion | |
dc.subject | Class actions | |
dc.title | The Centrist Case Against Current (Conservative) Arbitration Law | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
kusw.kuauthor | Ware, Stephen | |
kusw.kudepartment | Law | en_US |
kusw.oaversion | Article | en_US |
kusw.oapolicy | This item meets KU Open Access policy criteria. | en_US |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess |