Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLambourne, Kate
dc.contributor.authorWashburn, Richard A.
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Cheryl A.
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Debra K.
dc.contributor.authorGoetz, Jeannine
dc.contributor.authorLee, Robert
dc.contributor.authorMayo, Matthew S.
dc.contributor.authorDonnelly, Joseph E.
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-05T18:26:22Z
dc.date.available2017-06-05T18:26:22Z
dc.date.issued2012-09
dc.identifier.citationLambourne, K., Washburn, R. A., Gibson, C., Sullivan, D. K., Goetz, J., Lee, R., … Donnelly, J. E. (2012). Weight management by phone conference call: A comparison with a traditional face-to-face clinic. Rationale and design for a randomized equivalence trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 33(5), 1044–1055. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/24369
dc.description.abstractState-of-the-art treatment for weight management consists of a behavioral intervention to facilitate decreased energy intake and increased physical activity. These interventions are typically delivered face-to-face (FTF) by a health educator to a small group of participants. There are numerous barriers to participation in FTF clinics including availability, scheduling, the expense and time required to travel to the clinic site, and possible need for dependent care. Weight management clinics delivered by conference call have the potential to diminish or eliminate these barriers. The conference call approach may also reduce burden on providers, who could conduct clinic groups from almost any location without the expenses associated with maintaining FTF clinic space. A randomized trial will be conducted in 395 overweight/obese adults (BMI 25–39.9 kg/m2) to determine if weight loss (6 months) and weight maintenance (12 months) are equivalent between weight management interventions utilizing behavioral strategies and pre-packaged meals delivered by either a conference call or the traditional FTF approach. The primary outcome, body weight, will be assessed at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months. Secondary outcomes including waist circumference, energy and macronutrient intake, and physical activity and will be assessed on the same schedule. In addition, a cost analysis and extensive process evaluation will be completed.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectEquivalence trialen_US
dc.subjectConference callen_US
dc.subjectWeight lossen_US
dc.subjectWeight regain preventionen_US
dc.subjectPhysical activityen_US
dc.subjectPre-packaged mealsen_US
dc.titleWeight management by phone conference call: A comparision with a traditional face-to-face clinic. Rationale and design for a randomized equivalence trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorDonnelly, Joseph E.
kusw.kudepartmentLife Span Instituteen_US
kusw.oanotesPer SHERPA/RoMEO 6/5/2017: Author's Pre-print: green tick author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing) Author's Post-print: green tick author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) Publisher's Version/PDF: cross author cannot archive publisher's version/PDF General Conditions:

Authors pre-print on any website, including arXiv and RePEC Author's post-print on author's personal website immediately Author's post-print on open access repository after an embargo period of between 12 months and 48 months Permitted deposit due to Funding Body, Institutional and Governmental policy or mandate, may be required to comply with embargo periods of 12 months to 48 months Author's post-print may be used to update arXiv and RepEC Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used Must link to publisher version with DOI Author's post-print must be released with a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License
en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.014en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, author accepted manuscripten_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC3408567en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.