dc.contributor.author | Foley, Sean | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-02-16T22:17:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-16T22:17:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-10-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Foley, Sean. "RLUIPA's Equal-Terms Provision's Troubling Definition of Equal: Why the Equal-Terms Provision Must Be Interpreted Narrowly". Kansas Law Review, Kansas Law Review Inc. October, 2011: vol. 60(1). | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/20204 | |
dc.description | This is the published version. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Kansas Law Review Inc | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | http://law.ku.edu/kansas-law-review-issues# | |
dc.title | RLUIPA's Equal-Terms Provision's Troubling Definition of Equal: Why the Equal-Terms Provision Must Be Interpreted Narrowly | en_US |
dc.type | Article | |
kusw.kudepartment | Law | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17161/1808.20204 | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |