ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEdenfield, Brooke
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-16T22:15:21Z
dc.date.available2016-02-16T22:15:21Z
dc.date.issued2010-10-01
dc.identifier.citationEdenfield, Brooke. "Who Ya Gonna Call? Confusion Reigns After the Supreme Court’s Failure to Define Testimonial and Analyst in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts". Kansas Law Review, Kansas Law Review Inc. October, 2010: vol. 59(1).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/20175
dc.descriptionThis is the published version.en_US
dc.publisherKansas Law Review Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://law.ku.edu/kansas-law-review-issues#
dc.titleWho Ya Gonna Call? Confusion Reigns After the Supreme Court’s Failure to Define Testimonial and Analyst in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusettsen_US
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kudepartmentLaw
dc.identifier.doi10.17161/1808.20175
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record