dc.contributor.author | Corse, John | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-27T13:35:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-27T13:35:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1987-01-01 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/13736 | |
dc.description | This is the published version. | |
dc.description.abstract | Law enforcement officials have increasingly turned to aerial surveillance as a means of combating crime. Aerial surveillance often enables police to view areas that they otherwise would be unable to view without a warrant. Consequently, considerable conflict has developed over whether this means of surveillance constitutes a search under the fourth amendment. In California v. Ciraolo, the United States Supreme Court held that naked-eye aerial observations of the curtilage of a home, when made from navigable airspace, do not constitute a search protected by the fourth amendment. | |
dc.publisher | University of Kansas School of Law, Criminal Justice Clinic | |
dc.title | Aerial Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment – California v. Ciraolo | |
dc.type | Article | |
kusw.kuauthor | Corse, John | |
kusw.kudepartment | Law | |
kusw.oastatus | na | |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, publisher version | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |