ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .
Aerial Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment – California v. Ciraolo
dc.contributor.author | Corse, John | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-27T13:35:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-27T13:35:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1987-01-01 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/13736 | |
dc.description | This is the published version. | |
dc.description.abstract | Law enforcement officials have increasingly turned to aerial surveillance as a means of combating crime. Aerial surveillance often enables police to view areas that they otherwise would be unable to view without a warrant. Consequently, considerable conflict has developed over whether this means of surveillance constitutes a search under the fourth amendment. In California v. Ciraolo, the United States Supreme Court held that naked-eye aerial observations of the curtilage of a home, when made from navigable airspace, do not constitute a search protected by the fourth amendment. | |
dc.publisher | University of Kansas School of Law, Criminal Justice Clinic | |
dc.title | Aerial Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment – California v. Ciraolo | |
dc.type | Article | |
kusw.kuauthor | Corse, John | |
kusw.kudepartment | Law | |
kusw.oastatus | na | |
kusw.oaversion | Scholarly/refereed, publisher version | |
kusw.oapolicy | This item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | openAccess |