Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOutka, Uma
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-02T15:30:36Z
dc.date.available2013-08-02T15:30:36Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationUma Outka, Nepa and Environmental Justice: Integration, Implementation, and Judicial Review, 33 B.C. ENVTL. AFF. L. REV. 601 (2006).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/11561
dc.descriptionFull-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is to assure "for all Americans safe, healthful, productive, and esthetically and culturally pleasing surroundings," a goal that is essential to environmental justice. Although NEPA provides the structure for federal environmental decisionmaking, is it effective as a tool for addressing environmental justice concerns? This Essay addresses NEPA's limitations and potential for this purpose, and assesses the role of case law and judicial review in shaping this integrative process. To do so, it considers the environmental justice implications of NEPA's structural gaps--including exemptions, categorical exclusions, and so-called "functional equivalents" - and evaluates judicial review of agencies' environmental justice analyses to date.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherBoston College Law School
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=1559183
dc.subjectNepa
dc.subjectEnvironmental justice
dc.subjectCategorical exclusion
dc.titleNepa and Environmental Justice: Integration, Implementation, and Judicial Review
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorOutka, Uma
kusw.kudepartmentSchool of Law
kusw.oastatuswaivelicense
kusw.oapolicyThe license granted by the OA policy is waived for this item.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record