Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPatel, Herry
dc.contributor.authorNaish, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorSoreni, Noam
dc.contributor.authorAmlung, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-03T15:38:13Z
dc.date.available2022-05-03T15:38:13Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-08
dc.identifier.citationPatel H, Naish K, Soreni N and Amlung M (2022) The Effects of a Single Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Session on Impulsivity and Risk Among a Sample of Adult Recreational Cannabis Users. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 16:758285. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.758285en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/32743
dc.description.abstractIndividuals with substance use disorders exhibit risk-taking behaviors, potentially leading to negative consequences and difficulty maintaining recovery. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have yielded mixed effects on risk-taking among healthy controls. Given the importance of risk-taking behaviors among substance-using samples, this study aimed to examine the effects of tDCS on risk-taking among a sample of adults using cannabis. Using a double-blind design, 27 cannabis users [M(SD) age = 32.48 (1.99), 41% female] were randomized, receiving one session of active or sham tDCS over the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). Stimulation parameters closely followed prior studies with anodal right dlPFC and cathodal left dlPFC stimulation. Risk-taking—assessed via a modified Cambridge Gambling Task—was measured before and during tDCS. Delay and probability discounting tasks were assessed before and after stimulation. No significant effects of stimulation on risk-taking behavior were found. However, participants chose the less risky option ∼86% of the trials before stimulation which potentially contributed to ceiling effects. These results contradict one prior study showing increased risk-taking among cannabis users following tDCS. There was a significant increase in delay discounting of a $1000 delayed reward during stimulation for the sham group only, but no significant effects for probability discounting. The current study adds to conflicting and inconclusive literature on tDCS and cognition among substance-using samples. In conclusion, results suggest the ineffectiveness of single session dlPFC tDCS using an established stimulation protocol on risk-taking, although ceiling effects at baseline may have also prevented behavior change following tDCS.en_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 Patel, Naish, Soreni and Amlung. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectCannabisen_US
dc.subjectTranscranial direct current stimulationen_US
dc.subjectImpulsivityen_US
dc.subjectRisk takingen_US
dc.subjectDelay discountingen_US
dc.titleThe Effects of a Single Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Session on Impulsivity and Risk Among a Sample of Adult Recreational Cannabis Usersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorAmlung, Michael
kusw.kudepartmentApplied Behavioral Scienceen_US
kusw.kudepartmentCofrin Logan Center for Addiction Research and Treatmenten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fnhum.2022.758285en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC8861082en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © 2022 Patel, Naish, Soreni and Amlung. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: Copyright © 2022 Patel, Naish, Soreni and Amlung. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).