Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSeverson, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorConrad-Hiebner, Aislinn
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-01T21:23:15Z
dc.date.available2016-01-01T21:23:15Z
dc.date.issued2015-05-31
dc.date.submitted2015
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:13939
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/19385
dc.description.abstractChild physical abuse is a serious social problem associated with a host of risk factors and consequences, ranging from unemployment and poverty to substance use and criminality. Despite years of research on the etiology of child physical abuse, child physical abuse remains a persistent concern for our society. Exploring the relationship between poverty and child physical abuse is an underutilized approach for understanding and responding to child physical abuse. At present, much of the literature emphasizes the connection between maltreatment and income-based poverty. Using the family stress model, this dissertation research explores the impact of economic conditions (income and material hardship) on risk for child physical abuse, and the process by which these economic conditions contribute to an environment where child physical abuse occurs. With a sample of 4,845 mothers from the Fragile Families and Child Well-being Study (FFCWS), a full panel model of mediation was conducted over three waves of data to investigate the invariance of the proposed model (economic state, housing hardship, bill-paying hardship, health hardship, food hardship, depression, parenting stress, domestic violence, risk for child physical abuse); the effect of the mediators (parenting stress, depression and domestic violence) on the relationship between economic conditions and risk for child physical abuse; and the strongest economic predictors of risk for child physical abuse. Although the results indicate a good fit of the measurement and structural models to the data, the indirect and direct effects are negligible and non-significant, indicating no evidence of partial or full mediation (p<.005). Using p<.05, only one indirect pathway was significant: Maternal depression (year 5) significantly mediated the relationship between food hardship (year 3) and risk for child physical abuse (year 9) (β=.007, p<.05). Although the effect sizes were small, there were significant direct effects between bill-paying hardship and maternal parenting stress and domestic violence, food hardship and maternal depression, and economic state and parenting stress (p<.05). These results support the use of an inclusive model to explore the relationship between economic conditions and risk for child physical abuse, suggest directions for future research, and highlight the importance of emphasizing the roles of economic conditions and child maltreatment in policies and practices that affect families.
dc.format.extent126 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright held by the author.
dc.subjectSocial work
dc.subjectSocial research
dc.subjectChild Maltreatment Prevention
dc.subjectChild Physical Abuse
dc.subjectMaterial Hardship
dc.subjectPoverty
dc.subjectSecondary Data Analysis
dc.subjectStructural Equation Modeling
dc.titleEconomic Conditions and Risk for Child Physical Abuse per Maternal Report: The Mediating Roles of Parenting Stress, Depression, and Domestic Violence
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.cmtememberLittle, Todd
dc.contributor.cmtememberLieberman, Alice
dc.contributor.cmtememberScanlon, Edward
dc.contributor.cmtememberRury, John
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineSocial Welfare
dc.thesis.degreeLevelPh.D.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record