Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWare, Stephen J.
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T19:33:36Z
dc.date.available2014-12-11T19:33:36Z
dc.date.issued2014-06
dc.identifier.citation54 AMERICAN J. LEGAL HISTORY 351 (2014).
dc.identifier.issndebt, bankruptcy, creditor's rights, collection law, debtor-creditor law, consumer law
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/16081
dc.description.abstractIn the early twentieth century, Parliament debated whether to abolish imprisonment for debt. Parliament’s Select Committee on Debtors (Imprisonment) of 1909 heard testimony from witnesses and issued a report recommending the continuation of imprisonment for debt. This testimony and report make for fascinating history. Although imprisonment is not part of contemporary debates about debt collection and personal insolvency (consumer bankruptcy) law, the competing views expressed in Parliament over a century ago about consumer debtors and those who lend to them will be recognizable to anyone familiar with contemporary debates on either side of the Atlantic.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Journal of Legal History
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2431342
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2431342
dc.subjectDebt
dc.subjectBankruptcy
dc.subjectCreditor's rights
dc.subjectCollection law
dc.subjectDebtor-creditor law
dc.subjectConsumer law
dc.titleA 20th Century Debate About Imprisonment for Debt
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorWare, Stephen
kusw.kudepartmentLaw
kusw.oastatusfullparticipation
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record