Zane, ThomasJohnson, Lynette Kamachi2024-06-162024-06-162021-05-312021http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:17750https://hdl.handle.net/1808/35176AbstractSupervisor feedback is a powerful and effective tool that can be used to increase employee performance. However, there is a lack of information regarding the essential components of supervisor feedback. This study investigated the effects of the number and type of feedback statements provided by a supervisor on participant’s procedural integrity. Verbal corrective-corrective (CC), corrective-corrective-corrective (CCC), positive-positive (PP), and positive-positive-positive (PPP), were provided as consequences during the implementation of a receptive identification two-dimensional (2-D) picture card program. Overall, results showed that all conditions increased procedural integrity, with the PPP conditioned producing a slightly greater influence. Research, such as the current study, is needed to identify ways of providing feedback that are most effective in changing behavior that it follows. Feedback is a powerful tool for a supervisor, but like any power, needs to be used correctly and responsibly. Keywords: feedback statements, performance, positive feedback, corrective feedback82 pagesenCopyright held by the author.Behavioral sciencescorrective feedbackfeedback statementsperformancepositive feedbackThesis