Jarmolowicz, David PLeComte, Robert S2024-07-052024-07-052021-12-312021http://dissertations.umi.com/ku:18066https://hdl.handle.net/1808/35340Resurgence, or the reemergence of previously extinguished responding when current behavior is challenged, is typically studied using either a three or four-phase procedure. In three-phase procedures, a target response is reinforced (1); that response is extinguished while an alternative response is concurrently reinforced (2); and the alternative response is then placed on extinction (3). In four-phase procedures, a target response is reinforced (1); that response is extinguished absent of alternative reinforcement (2); the target response remains on extinction while an alternative response is reinforced (3); and the alternative response is then placed on extinction (4).Although both procedures have generated a wealth of data, some debate remains as to whether extinguishing the target response before reinforcing an alternative significantly impacts resurgence. To evaluate resurgence in three and four-phase procedures, the current study used a within-subjects approach with 12 rats. All animals completed training under both three and four-phase resurgence arrangements. Results showed markedly greater resurgence when animals completed a three-phase resurgence procedure compared to when a four-phase procedure was in effect. These findings potentially carry a range of implications both for the selection of procedures and for current theoretical models attempting to account for the mechanisms underlying resurgence behavior.55 pagesenCopyright held by the author.Behavioral sciencesAnimal BehaviorResurgenceA Comparison of Resurgence During Three and Four-Phase ProceduresThesis