Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcCray Pearson, Joyce A.
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-17T15:30:29Z
dc.date.available2012-02-17T15:30:29Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.citation5 Kan. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 31 Y
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/8757
dc.description.abstractThe Adarand case was significant as it applied the strict scrutiny test to a challenge to an affirmative action program. The program provided cash incentives to prime contractors who subcontracted with minority firms. A contractor who submitted the lowest bid but lost the bid to a Hispanic-owned firm filed suit challenging various aspects of the Department of Transportations’ affirmative action program. The article sets out the backdrop for the creation of affirmative action programs and points out the flaws and strengths in the rationale behind the decision and the dissent.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKansas Journal of Law and Public Policy
dc.subjectAdarand
dc.subjectMonopoly
dc.titleThe Adarand Case: Now Narrowly Tailored to Prevent Monopoly and Competition
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorMcCray Pearson, Joyce A.
kusw.kudepartmentWheat Law Library, Law School
kusw.oastatuswaivelicense
kusw.oaversionScholary, edited volume
kusw.oapolicyThe license granted by the OA policy is waived for this item.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record