Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTenHouten, Warren D.
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Charles D.
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-19T18:11:40Z
dc.date.available2009-05-19T18:11:40Z
dc.date.issued1972-10-01
dc.identifier.citationKansas Journal of Sociology, Volume 8, Number 2 (FALL, 1972), pp. 155-175 http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.4763
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/4763
dc.description.abstractThe discovery in neurology that the two sides of the brain think in distinct ways that are both opposed to each other and complementary might have consequences in a number of academic disciplines, and in philosophy and political consciousness as well. It is the purpose of this paper to apply concepts from the brain theory to an analysis of the rational foundations of scientific inquiry. To pursue this argument, it is nnecessary to take a position on the side of materialism or idealism, although the theory certainly is related to that issue. And it should be made clear, at the outset, that we see no possibility that the explanation of ideas can be reduced to a physical theory such as physics.
dc.description.urihttp://web.ku.edu/~starjrnl
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDepartment of Sociology, University of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright (c) Social Thought and Research. For rights questions please contact Editor, Department of Sociology, Social Thought and Research, Fraser Hall, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045.
dc.titleDIALECTICAL FOUNDATIONS OF SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.17161/STR.1808.4763
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record