This paper begins with pointing the theoretical weaknesses of the CUC which is based on the uniformity condition (Chomsky (1992) and Chomsky & Lasnik (1993)). To solve the problems, I introduced the refined CUC and Barriers with a new adjunction condition that is adopted from Frampton (1990). Concerning the problems raised by subject/object asymmetry and wh-in-situ constructions, I have introduced a [+p] feature (Watanahe (1991) and Chomsky (1992)). However, I have stepped further from them. To have a more general theory, I have separated I-to-C Raising (or [T+AGRs]-to-C Raising) into two parts: the one occurring before Spell-Out by [+p], and the other after Spell-Out by IT+AGRs]. I assumed that erasure of offending traces in the Spec of AGRsP in the overt syntax through L-marking by [+p] does not influence the judgment of grammaticality at all. I have shown that the movement of Wh-in-situ at LF can also he explained by the constraints developed in this paper.
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please
share your stories
about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: This work is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. For more information, please see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.