Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJermy, M. C.
dc.contributor.authorSpence, C. J. T.
dc.contributor.authorKirton, R.
dc.contributor.authorO’Donnell, J. F.
dc.contributor.authorKabaliuk, N.
dc.contributor.authorGaw, S.
dc.contributor.authorHockey, H.
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Y.
dc.contributor.authorZulkhairi Abidin, Z.
dc.contributor.authorDougherty, R. L.
dc.contributor.authorRowe, P.
dc.contributor.authorMahaliyana, A. S.
dc.contributor.authorGibbs, A.
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, S. A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-10T19:43:00Z
dc.date.available2022-01-10T19:43:00Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-12
dc.identifier.citationJermy MC, Spence CJT, Kirton R, O’Donnell JF, Kabaliuk N, Gaw S, et al. (2021) Assessment of dispersion of airborne particles of oral/nasal fluid by high flow nasal cannula therapy. PLoS ONE 16(2): e0246123. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246123en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/32378
dc.description.abstractBackground Nasal High Flow (NHF) therapy delivers flows of heated humidified gases up to 60 LPM (litres per minute) via a nasal cannula. Particles of oral/nasal fluid released by patients undergoing NHF therapy may pose a cross-infection risk, which is a potential concern for treating COVID-19 patients.

Methods Liquid particles within the exhaled breath of healthy participants were measured with two protocols: (1) high speed camera imaging and counting exhaled particles under high magnification (6 participants) and (2) measuring the deposition of a chemical marker (riboflavin-5-monophosphate) at a distance of 100 and 500 mm on filter papers through which air was drawn (10 participants). The filter papers were assayed with HPLC. Breathing conditions tested included quiet (resting) breathing and vigorous breathing (which here means nasal snorting, voluntary coughing and voluntary sneezing). Unsupported (natural) breathing and NHF at 30 and 60 LPM were compared.

Results Imaging: During quiet breathing, no particles were recorded with unsupported breathing or 30 LPM NHF (detection limit for single particles 33 μm). Particles were detected from 2 of 6 participants at 60 LPM quiet breathing at approximately 10% of the rate caused by unsupported vigorous breathing. Unsupported vigorous breathing released the greatest numbers of particles. Vigorous breathing with NHF at 60 LPM, released half the number of particles compared to vigorous breathing without NHF. Chemical marker tests: No oral/nasal fluid was detected in quiet breathing without NHF (detection limit 0.28 μL/m3). In quiet breathing with NHF at 60 LPM, small quantities were detected in 4 out of 29 quiet breathing tests, not exceeding 17 μL/m3. Vigorous breathing released 200–1000 times more fluid than the quiet breathing with NHF. The quantities detected in vigorous breathing were similar whether using NHF or not.

Conclusion During quiet breathing, 60 LPM NHF therapy may cause oral/nasal fluid to be released as particles, at levels of tens of μL per cubic metre of air. Vigorous breathing (snort, cough or sneeze) releases 200 to 1000 times more oral/nasal fluid than quiet breathing (p < 0.001 with both imaging and chemical marker methods). During vigorous breathing, 60 LPM NHF therapy caused no statistically significant difference in the quantity of oral/nasal fluid released compared to unsupported breathing. NHF use does not increase the risk of dispersing infectious aerosols above the risk of unsupported vigorous breathing. Standard infection prevention and control measures should apply when dealing with a patient who has an acute respiratory infection, independent of which, if any, respiratory support is being used.
en_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rights© 2021 Jermy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.titleAssessment of dispersion of airborne particles of oral/nasal fluid by high flow nasal cannula therapyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorDougherty, R. L.
kusw.kudepartmentMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0246123en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-9374-7570en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-2187-5223en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item meets KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC7880466en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 Jermy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as: © 2021 Jermy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.