KUKU

KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Older Adults’ Written Accounts of Recent Intergenerational Conflict: Initiating Factors and Management Styles

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Wiebe_ku_0099D_15840_DATA_1.pdf (741.3Kb)
    Issue Date
    2018-05-31
    Author
    Wiebe, Weston Tyler
    Publisher
    University of Kansas
    Format
    117 pages
    Type
    Dissertation
    Degree Level
    Ph.D.
    Discipline
    Communication Studies
    Rights
    Copyright held by the author.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    From theoretical perspectives of conflict management and communication accommodation, this study used a content analytic approach to examine older adults’ reports of intergenerational communication in a recent conflict with a grandchild or a nonfamily young adult. Voluntary participants included four hundred and twenty-seven older adults (N = 427, M age = 74.40, SD = 6.18, age range = 61-95) who were first asked to think about a family or nonfamily intergenerational relationship and then to provide a written account about a conflict they were experiencing or had experienced recently in that relationship. Only a portion of the older adults (i.e., 42.4%; n = 181; M age = 74.38, SD = 6.92, age range = 63-95) reported a recent intergenerational conflict in this sample. These written conflict scenarios (i.e., 96 scenarios with grandchildren and 85 scenarios with nonfamily young adults) were analyzed to uncover conflict initiating factors and conflict management styles. In general, chi-square analysis revealed the prevalence of conflict due to old-to-young criticism (n = 57). Disagreement/generation gap (n = 49), young-to-old rebuff (n = 32), cumulative annoyance (n = 26), and young-to-old criticism (n = 14) were also identified. Specifically, results indicated that disagreement/generation gap was reported more frequently in conflicts with grandchildren and old-to-young criticism was reported more frequently in conflicts with nonfamily young adults. In addition, chi-square analysis of the conflict management styles revealed that older adults used the problem-solving (n = 73) and competing styles (n = 67) most frequently and the young adults used the competing style (n = 80) most frequently. Furthermore, results demonstrated that young adults tended to use the avoiding style with grandparents and the competing style with nonfamily elders. On the other hand, older adults reported themselves as using the problem-solving style more with grandchildren and the competing style more with nonfamily young adults. Additionally, the obliging and third-party styles were reported to be used by both young and older adults. In terms of the associations between initiating factors and management styles, results indicated that young and older adults dealt with intergenerational conflict in different ways. In general, the competing style was mostly used when old-to-young criticism initiated the conflict. Further, cumulative annoyance was associated with young adults’ use of the avoiding style and disagreement/generation gap was associated with the problem-solving style for both young and older adults. In terms of the associations between management styles, the use of the competing and problem-solving styles by young adults were significantly associated with the use of the same styles by older adults, indicating both positive and negative reciprocation in intergenerational conflict. The participants who did not report a recent intergenerational conflict (n = 246; M age = 73.64, SD = 5.88, age range = 60-89) were asked to comment on and describe communication characteristics in the relationship by focusing on the reasons why they reported no recent conflict. Content analysis indicated that older adults reported several accommodative characteristics of their communication in both family and nonfamily intergenerational relationships. These accommodative characteristics included respect (n = 57; reported significantly more frequently in family relationships), appropriate management of interpersonal boundaries (n = 46; reported significantly more frequently in nonfamily relationships), a general understanding for each other (n = 20; reported significantly more frequently in nonfamily relationships), and attentive communication and listening and discussing topics of interest (no differences between family and nonfamily relationships). Overall, the current study contributed to research literature in intergenerational conflict in several ways. First, it uncovered conflict initiating factors and conflict management styles in family and nonfamily intergenerational relationships, an area that has been under studied. Second, it provided a new perspective of intergenerational conflict from the older adults’ point of view, which corroborated and contrasted prior intergenerational conflict research from the young adults’ perspective. Third, analysis of the accommodative communication characteristics from those older participants who did not report a recent intergenerational conflict provided baseline data to enhance our understanding of the bright side of communication accommodation in intergenerational relationships. Overall, results suggested that older adults might experience or perceive intergenerational relationships in conflict situations more positively than young adults. Major findings are discussed considering intergenerational communication, interpersonal and intergroup conflict management, shared family identity, and communication accommodation theory.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1808/27899
    Collections
    • Communication Studies Dissertations and Theses [275]
    • Dissertations [4660]

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    The University of Kansas
      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps