ATTENTION: The software behind KU ScholarWorks is being upgraded to a new version. Starting July 15th, users will not be able to log in to the system, add items, nor make any changes until the new version is in place at the end of July. Searching for articles and opening files will continue to work while the system is being updated. If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Reed at mreed@ku.edu .

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorO’Reilly, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorSperry, Jayne
dc.contributor.authorDarwin, David
dc.contributor.authorLafikes, James
dc.contributor.authorSomogie, Isaac
dc.contributor.authorStorm, Scott
dc.contributor.authorBrowning, JoAnn
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-18T17:50:20Z
dc.date.available2017-12-18T17:50:20Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-01
dc.identifier.citationO’Reilly, M., Sperry, J., Darwin, D., Lafikes, J., Somogie, I., Storm, S., & Browning, J. (2017). Corrosion Performance of Poorly Pickled Stainless Steel Reinforcement. ACI Materials Journal, 114(6). doi:10.14359/51701008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/25655
dc.description.abstractXM-28 (UNS S24100) and 2304 (UNS S32304) stainless steel reinforcing bars with different levels of pickling were evaluated for corrosion resistance using the rapid macrocell and cracked beam tests outlined in ASTM A955. Two heats of XM-28 from the same producer were evaluated using the rapid macrocell test. A single heat of 2304 was evaluated in two conditions; as-received from the manufacturer and re-pickled using both ASTM A955 tests. The poorly pickled heat of XM-28 reinforcement failed the rapid macrocell test with a peak individual corrosion rate exceeding 16 µm/y, while the properly pickled heat passed with no significant corrosion measured. The poorly pickled 2304 reinforcing steel failed the macrocell and cracked beam tests, with peak corrosion rates of 1.07 and 6.48 µm/y, respectively, while upon re-pickling, the same heat of steel passed both tests. These results suggest the need for a method to verify that the pickling process has been performed properly. Performance during the first week of the rapid macrocell tests or requiring that the bars exhibit a bright, shiny, uniformly light surface represent two potential methods for establishing the adequacy of pickling.en_US
dc.publisherAmerican Concrete Instituteen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2017, American Concrete Institute. All rights reserved, including the making of copies unless permission is obtained from the copyright proprietors.en_US
dc.subjectChloridesen_US
dc.subjectCorrosionen_US
dc.subjectMicrocellen_US
dc.subjectPicklingen_US
dc.subjectStainless steelen_US
dc.titleCorrosion Performance of Poorly Pickled Stainless Steel Reinforcementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorO'Reilly, Matthew
kusw.kuauthorDarwin, David
kusw.kuauthorBrowning, JoAnn
kusw.kudepartmentCivil Engineeringen_US
kusw.oastatusna
dc.identifier.doi10.14359/51701008en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5039-3525
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record