KUKU

KU ScholarWorks

  • myKU
  • Email
  • Enroll & Pay
  • KU Directory
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Theses
    • View Item
    •   KU ScholarWorks
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Effect of Column Stiffness on Consolidation Behavior of Stone Column-Treated Clay

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Abdulrasool_ku_0099M_15022_DATA_1.pdf (10.73Mb)
    Issue Date
    2016-12-31
    Author
    Abdulrasool, Ghaith
    Publisher
    University of Kansas
    Format
    90 pages
    Type
    Thesis
    Degree Level
    M.S.
    Discipline
    Civil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering
    Rights
    Copyright held by the author.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Stone columns have been proved an effective ground improvement technique. The increase in land prices and the existence of soft clay deposits in many areas around the world has encouraged the use and development of this technique. Stone columns can be used to accelerate the consolidation of soft clay deposits through two mechanisms. First, the stone columns act as vertical drains that provide additional drainage path for excess pore water pressure to dissipate. Second, they reduce the excess pore water pressure by transferring more load from the soil to the columns because they are stiffer than the surrounding soil. Stone columns may not work well in very soft soil due to bulging of the columns. Woven geotextile has been used to minimize bulging of the columns and improve their performance (capacity and stiffness). For the geotextile encased stone columns, geotextile filtration adds another benefit by minimizing fine particles migrating from the surrounding soil into the stone columns and maintaining their high permeability in a long term. The increased stiffness of the stone columns by the geotextile is expected to have an effect on the consolidation rate. However, this effect has not been well investigated. This study investigated the effect of column stiffness on the consolidation behavior and the stress transfer mechanism of the stone column-reinforced foundation through several small-scale model tests. Both ordinary and geotextile encased stone columns were utilized. For comparison purposes, a special PVD “column” was formed, which had nearly zero stiffness. In each test, a soil bed was first formed from a slurry by preloading in a rigid steel chamber with a dimension of 280 mm in diameter and 450 mm in height. A model stone column of 100 mm in diameter was installed in the center of the soil bed to the bottom of the steel chamber. Piezometers were placed inside the chamber at different depths and distances to the center to measure the generation and dissipation of excess pore water pressure. The pressure was applied in increments on a steel plate seated on the soil. After the application of each pressure increment, the pressure was maintained until the plate displacement was smaller than 1 mm/day. The vertical stress transfer between the soft soil and the column was monitored by earth pressure cells on the soil and the column. The test results show that the ordinary stone columns effectively reduced the consolidation time by 25%, as compared with the PVD “column”, while the encased stone columns further reduced the time by 40%. The ordinary stone columns also reduced the settlement by 36% as compared with the PVD “column” while the encased columns further reduced the settlement by 56%. The test results show that the stone columns with and without geotextile encasement carried more load than the surrounding soil. The steady stress concentration ratio, defined as the stress on the column to that on the soil, was found in the range of 4 to 6 for ordinary stone columns while it ranged from 4 to 11 for the encased stone columns. The modulus improvement factor, defined as the modulus of the PVD “column” treated foundation to that of a stone column treated foundation, was found to be 1.7 and 2.4 for the ordinary and encased stone columns, respectively. Finally, the theoretical solutions developed by Han and Ye (2001, 2002) were used to compare with the test results. The comparisons show good agreement between the theoretical solutions and the test results.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1808/24159
    Collections
    • Theses [3710]

    Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


    We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.


    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    Browse

    All of KU ScholarWorksCommunities & CollectionsThis Collection

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact KU ScholarWorks
    785-864-8983
    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    785-864-8983

    KU Libraries
    1425 Jayhawk Blvd
    Lawrence, KS 66045
    Image Credits
     

     

    The University of Kansas
      Contact KU ScholarWorks
    Lawrence, KS | Maps
     
    • Academics
    • Admission
    • Alumni
    • Athletics
    • Campuses
    • Giving
    • Jobs

    The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, IOA@ku.edu, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

     Contact KU
    Lawrence, KS | Maps