Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMurray, K. Greg
dc.contributor.authorFeinsinger, Peter
dc.contributor.authorBusby, William H.
dc.contributor.authorLinhart, Yan B.
dc.contributor.authorBeach, James H.
dc.contributor.authorKinsman, Sharon
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-09T15:34:55Z
dc.date.available2016-09-09T15:34:55Z
dc.date.issued1987-10-01
dc.identifier.citationMurray, K. G., Feinsinger, P., Busby, W. H., Linhart, Y. B., Beach, J. H., & Kinsman, S. (1987). Evaluation of character displacement among plants in two tropical pollination guilds. Ecology, 68(5), 1283-1293.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/21480
dc.description.abstractIn cloud forest at Monteverde, Costa Rica, two guilds of bird—pollinated plants exist; on guild pollinated by long—billed hummingbirds, primarily the Green Hermit (Phaethornis guy), and one guild pollinated by short—billed hummingbirds, primarily the Purple—throated Mountain—gem (Lampornis calolaema). Plants were assigned to guilds based on hummingbird visit patterns documented during >4000 plant—hours of field observations, and on identities of pollen grains collected from 600 mist—netted hummingbirds. Other studies indicated that pollination in these plants is often insufficient for maximum seed set. Each guild was examined for character displacement expected within a stable assemblage of plants structured by competition for pollination. (1) By comparing observed flowering phenologies with those obtained through a randomization procedure, we determined whether each species' phenology minimized overlap with the remainder of its guild. (2) We also examined complementarity between phenological displacement and morphological displacement in reproductive structures. Neither guild exhibited pronounced character displacement. (1) In most cases, flowering phenologies were indistinguishable from those generated at random; the few statistically significant departures mostly indicated aggregation, rather than displacement, of flowering seasons. (2) In most cases, morphological similarity was independent of phenological similarity. The only statistically significant result among the studied species was a positive correlation, among long—flowered species only, between rarity and uniqueness of flowering season. We do not conclude that this absence of expected pattern indicates that competition never occurs or that competition is an inconsequential ecological event. Rather, we attribute absence of pattern to the following aspects of biological variability, two of which we have demonstrated in other studies. (1) Within any one year, density—dependent competition for pollination is sporadic, and is not clearly related to flowering season or morphological similarity. (2) The nature of interspecific interactions varies among years, as neither the relative intensities of flowering nor the flowering seasons themselves are consistent from year to year. (3) The nature of interspecific interactions varies with changes in species composition, which occur over short distances. (4) The assemblage of species is probably not stable over long time spans; the species have Gleasonian ecologies that change distribution and abundance faster than natural selection or diffuse competition can screen out improper phenotypes or species, respectively.en_US
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_US
dc.rightsCopyright by the Ecological Society of Americaen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Character Displacement Among Plants in Two Tropical Pollination Guildsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
kusw.kuauthorBusby, William H.
kusw.kudepartmentEcology & Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/1939213en_US
kusw.oaversionScholarly/refereed, publisher versionen_US
kusw.oapolicyThis item does not meet KU Open Access policy criteria.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record