Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPeterson, Andrew Townsend
dc.contributor.authorOwens, Hannah L.
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-11T23:31:34Z
dc.date.available2015-12-11T23:31:34Z
dc.date.issued2015-05-31
dc.date.submitted2015
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/ku:13884
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/19185
dc.description.abstractI employed multidisciplinary approaches for understanding distributions of marine fishes in the present, past, and future, and for considering more broadly the historical role of primary research in policy decisions. In chapter 1, I generated ecological niche models (ENMs) for Latimeria chalumnae using two different modeling algorithms; these models anticipated occurrences of L. chalumnae's sister species, L. menadoensis, but sample sizes were not large enough to assess the statistical significance of these species' niche similarity. Furthermore, the range of coelacanths may extend beyond their presently known distributions; future exploration may reveal additional populations of these elusive fishes. In chapter 2, I developed a holistic biogeographic history of codfishes in the subfamily Gadinae. I found both ecological niche and geographic distributions of gadine fishes to be largely conservative, but two clades, tomcods and crown cods, included both Pacific and Atlantic species. Divergence in both clades was estimated to have begun in the Pliocene; environmental tolerance reconstructions support temperate origins of both clades, and cyclical Arctic ice formation may have driven divergence. In chapter 3, I addressed the role of general circulation model (GCM) bias as a significant source of uncertainty in estimates of species' potential distributional responses to climate change. ENMs of 15 gadine species calibrated using an observation-based dataset and a dataset derived from the CCSM4 GCM showed areas of disagreement concordant with known GCM biases. Consciousness of bias in GCM data will allow researchers and policy makers to identify areas of particular concern for biodiversity more realistically. Finally, in chapter 4, I explored the evolution of the relationship between policy makers and researchers through the lens of the U.S. Fisheries Service. Building cooperative capacity between these two groups led to a more systematic understanding of the oceans, and thus to success in reducing numbers of overfished stocks.
dc.format.extent119 pages
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas
dc.rightsCopyright held by the author.
dc.subjectBiology
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectSystematic biology
dc.subjectbiogeography
dc.subjectcharacter reconstruction
dc.subjectecological niche modeling
dc.subjectGadinae
dc.subjectLatimeria
dc.titleMODELING SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS: APPLICATIONS AND METHODS FOR MARINE BIOGEOGRAPHY AND CONSERVATION
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.cmtememberWiley, Edward O
dc.contributor.cmtememberMort, Mark
dc.contributor.cmtememberSmith, William Leo
dc.contributor.cmtememberEgbert, Stephen
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineEcology & Evolutionary Biology
dc.thesis.degreeLevelPh.D.
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0071-1745
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record