Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGottlieb, David J.
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-25T14:48:27Z
dc.date.available2013-06-25T14:48:27Z
dc.date.issued1982
dc.identifier.citationDavid J. Gottlieb, Federal Parole and Sentencing: A Report on the Present and Some Thoughts for the Future, 13 LOY. U. CHI. L.J. 669 (1982).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/11322
dc.descriptionFull-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.
dc.description.abstractIn the past fifteen years an almost unanimous consensus has developed over the need for sentencing reform. Critics have maintained that the unregulated discretion currently granted judges fosters extensive and unwarranted disparity in the treatment of like cases. Commentators have condemned indeterminate parole and sentencing procedures as morally unjustifiable, and as a cause of prison unrest. Underlying both these concerns is disillusionment with the rehabilitative ideal.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherLoyola University Chicago School of Law
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=2203733
dc.titleFederal Parole and Sentencing: A Report on the Present and Some Thoughts for the Future
dc.typeArticle
kusw.kuauthorGottlieb, David J.
kusw.kudepartmentSchool of Law
kusw.oastatuswaivelicense
kusw.oapolicyThe license granted by the OA policy is waived for this item.
dc.rights.accessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record